Current Court Cases - Search News

Takeaways from Supreme Court hearing on trans athletes

Supreme Court hears arguments in landmark transgender athletes’ cases | The Excerpt

Plaintiffs argued that Title IX and the 14th Amendment protected their rights. Government lawyers argued that the bans protect a wider swath of women.

· 1d

Supreme Court hears arguments in blockbuster cases challenging transgender sports bans

· 1d · on MSN

Supreme Court appears skeptical of challenges to bans on trans athletes

· 1d

Which states have trans athlete bans for students? What to know

At least half of the states in the nation have bans on transgender students competing in sports according to their gender identity, a USA TODAY review of state laws and policy documents found.

· 22h

US Supreme Court Conservatives Lean Toward Allowing Transgender Sports Bans

· 1d

US Supreme Court appears likely to uphold restrictions on transgender athletes

· 1d

Takeaways from Supreme Court arguments on transgender athletes

For over three hours, the justices waded through exceedingly technical debates and hypotheticals as they tried to assess whether the bans enacted by Idaho and West Virginia are consistent with the 14t...

· 15h

Conservative Supreme Court Justices Seem Ready To Let Trans Athlete Bans Stand

· 1d

Supreme Court Highlights: Justices Seem Inclined to Allow States to Bar Transgender Athletes

Campaigns & Elections

Three Supreme Court Cases That Could Reshape Politics in 2026

The Supreme Court is set to weigh in on laws like the Voting Rights Act and limits on coordinated party expenditures.

PBS

Supreme Court term begins with cases on voting rights, tariffs and conversion therapy

This article originally appeared on The Conversation. The most influential cases before the U.S. Supreme Court this term, which begins on Oct. 6, 2025, reflect the cultural and partisan clashes of American politics. The major cases in October and November ...

Hosted on MSN

Court case shows tax penalties multiply

A recent tax court decision has put a spotlight on how small filing mistakes can snowball into large penalties over time. Financial expert Jamie Golombek said the case shows how a simple error, repeated across years, can lead to steep costs for taxpayers.