The Supreme Court’s oral arguments are, at their core, exercises in advanced legal reasoning – disputes over constitutional boundaries, statutory ambiguities, and the very structure of American ...
This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated. WASHINGTON (AP) — Justice Elena Kagan on ...
Justice Kagan acknowledged an unspoken truth in standing law: it is easier for blue litigants to have standing than for red litigants. There are many asymmetries in the law between liberals and ...
Trump v. Slaughter is among the most important tests to date of the Supreme Court’s view of the “unitary executive theory” – the idea that control over the entire executive branch is vested in the ...
This is how the government turns protected speech into a federal crime.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results