A revised Form 26AS shifted Rs. 7.58 crore interest income from AY 2016-17 to AY 2018-19 which led to same income being ...
The interim order allowed DGGI to interrogate the petitioner but restrained it from arresting him in connection with the ...
Adjudication order liable to be quashed on non-intimation of SCN uploaded only under “Additional Notices and Orders” tab ...
Limitation for appellate remedy u/s 85 of Finance Act commences from date of communication of the adjudication order ...
GSTAT held that a tax demand could not be sustained when the show cause notice proposed liability only under IGST but the ...
Amazon invited applications for the post of Senior Finance Analyst Description Amazon seeks a Senior FinanceAnalyst to be a ...
The tribunal to examine the statutory mechanism for transfer and availment of GST ITC following a merger or amalgamation and ...
Pre-charge evidence without issuing a formal summons u/s 223 of the BNSS violates the right to a fair trial under Article 21 ...
The officers are restricted from uploading confidential taxpayer data into unauthorized AI platforms to protect privacy, ...
Later-available financial data may reveal better comparables but any new inclusion or exclusion must still satisfy Section 92C and Rule 10B.
As tools and consumables used by the contractor’s staff were not transferred to GCC, the contract did not qualify as a composite supply, rendering it ineligible for GST exemption.
GST is not imposed merely because a payment is made through UPI. This article gives the answer on whether GST liability arises from making a UPI transaction and explores various aspects.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results