In 5-4 ruling, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett dissent, high court says EPA has responsibility to provide details for ...
The Supreme Court’s ruling weakens the EPA’s ability to enforce water pollution standards, benefiting corporate interests at the expense of public health and environmental safety. With enforcement ...
But over the past 50 years, some places have occasionally run afoul of the act. In San Francisco, the wastewater system ...
On March 3, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court decided City and County of San Francisco, California v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 23-753, ...
1h
Local News Matters on MSNRuling in favor of SF stormwater discharge permit casts doubt on clean water standardsA years-long dispute over a San Francisco stormwater discharge permit came to an end Tuesday with a decision by the U.S.
Continuing the rout of the EPA's authority undertaken by the Trump Administration, the Supreme Court Tuesday overturned rules ...
The U.S. Supreme Court limited federal and state regulations under the Clean Water Act, but the practical impact remains to ...
On March 4, 2025 the Supreme Court overturned the 9th Circuit to rule in favor of the City of San Francisco in a landmark Clean Water Act case.
The Supreme Court's recent ruling limits EPA's ability to regulate sewage discharge into U.S. waterways affecting water ...
San Francisco argued that Clean Water Act permits should function like recipes that restrict specific ingredients in a dish, ...
The US Supreme Court sided with the city and county of San Francisco on Tuesday in a dispute with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), finding the EPA cannot penalize the city if water quality ...
A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday made it harder for environmental regulators to limit water pollution, ruling for San Francisco in a case about the discharge of raw ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results