An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
Conservatives on the Supreme Court have again rescued the nation from out-of-control bureaucrats inflicting prohibitive costs ...
The New Republic on MSN1dOpinion
The Supreme Court Muddied the Clean Water Act Yet AgainAmy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices in a dissent against Samuel Alito—and his thinly veiled policy agenda.
Tuesday that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) rules for the city of San Francisco under the Clean Water Act on raw ...
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the EPA overstepped by imposing vague sewage limits on San Francisco, curbing agency power ...
The Supreme Court's decision is the latest in which conservative justices have reined in pollution control efforts.
The Supreme Court's conservative majority ruled for San Francisco in limiting the power of environmental regulators to ...
The U.S. Supreme Court sided with San Francisco on Tuesday in a ruling that narrows the Clean Water Act. The case pitted a ...
San Francisco argued that Clean Water Act permits should function like recipes that restrict specific ingredients in a dish, ...
The justices ruled that the agency cannot impose generic prohibitions against violating water quality standards.
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court substantially weakened federal limitations on raw sewage discharge into nearby bodies of water.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback