An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
Conservatives on the Supreme Court have again rescued the nation from out-of-control bureaucrats inflicting prohibitive costs ...
According to the New York Times, the Supreme Court made a decision on whether the Clean Water Act of 1972 allowed the E.P.A.
What was once a quiet trail used by locals has become a high-traffic destination,” said the letter proposing the pilot ...
A majority of the Supreme Court sides with San Francisco over a permit the Environmental Protection Agency issued the city.
The Supreme Court sided with San Francisco on Tuesday in a case that could have long-term consequences for the Bay Area’s environmental protections and water quality. In a 5-4 decision authored by ...
Americans are getting antsy about the possibility of poop in the drinking water thanks to a new interpretation of the Clean Water Act. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that many are ...
In 5-4 ruling, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett dissent, high court says EPA has responsibility to provide details for ...
The Supreme Court’s ruling weakens the EPA’s ability to enforce water pollution standards, benefiting corporate interests at the expense of public health and environmental safety. With enforcement ...
The U.S. Supreme Court has limited how flexible the Environmental Protection Agency and states can be in regulating water ...
On March 3, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court decided City and County of San Francisco, California v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 23-753, ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback